Corporate Tax

One Side Adjusted. What Happens to the Other?

By BIFI Partners9 min read

In short

Where the FTA or a taxable person adjusts taxable income to meet the arm's length standard, Article 34(10) requires the FTA to make a corresponding adjustment to the UAE Related Party's taxable income. Where a foreign competent authority makes the adjustment, Article 34(11) instead allows the taxable person to apply to the FTA for one.

A transfer pricing adjustment is only half a transaction. If one company's income goes up because a price was too low, the counterparty's deduction was correspondingly too high. Whether that second entry is ever made is what decides if the group has paid the right amount of tax overall or been taxed twice on the same profit. The Corporate Tax Law answers that question twice, and the two answers are not the same.

How an adjustment arises in the first place

Article 34(7) recognises that applying the selected method may produce an arm's length range of financial results rather than a single figure. Article 34(8) then provides that where the result of the transaction does not fall within that range, the Authority shall adjust the taxable income to achieve the arm's length result that best reflects the facts and circumstances.

Article 34(9) attaches a constraint that is easy to overlook and useful to know. Where the Authority makes an adjustment under Clause 8, it shall rely on information that can or will be made available to the taxable person. An adjustment cannot rest on material the taxpayer is never allowed to see.

Related guideThere Is No UAE Comparable. Now What?

Domestic: the corresponding adjustment is mandatory

Article 34(10) is the provision that matters for two UAE parties. Where the Authority or a taxable person adjusts the taxable income for a transaction or arrangement to meet the arm's length standard, the Authority shall make a corresponding adjustment to the taxable income of the Related Party that is party to that transaction.

Two features of that sentence do real work. It is expressed as shall, not may. And it is triggered by an adjustment made by the Authority or by the taxable person — a self-adjustment brings the counterparty adjustment with it.

Cross-border: it becomes an application

Article 34(11) covers the other case. Where a foreign competent authority makes an adjustment to a transaction or arrangement involving a taxable person to meet the arm's length standard, that taxable person can make an application to the Authority to make a corresponding adjustment to its taxable income.

The contrast with Clause 10 is the point of this article. Domestically, the Authority shall adjust. Cross-border, the taxable person can apply. There is no automatic relief when it is a foreign tax authority that moved first, and the guide confirms the FTA will review the foreign adjustment rather than simply give effect to it.

The guide adds that a taxable person can request the corresponding adjustment under the applicable provisions of the relevant Double Taxation Agreement. Article 34(11) itself does not condition the application on a treaty, so the guide is describing the ordinary route rather than restating a statutory limit — a distinction worth holding onto where no treaty covers the counterparty's jurisdiction.

Related guideThe UK–UAE Double Tax Treaty: What Changed Once the UAE Started Taxing Profits

The guide's worked figures

Example 25 in the guide runs the arithmetic. Company A, a UAE resident, sells finished goods to Related Party Company X under a policy of cost plus 6%. The FTA assesses the arm's length mark-up for similar transactions under similar conditions at 8% on cost, and adjusts Company A accordingly.

On operating cost of AED 5,000,000, revenue from Company X moves from AED 5,300,000 to AED 5,400,000, and Company A's profit moves from AED 300,000 to AED 400,000.

Company A and Company X then approached the FTA and requested a corresponding adjustment to limit the impact of double taxation on the same income. The FTA reviewed the position and agreed. In Company X, revenue from third parties stays at AED 6,500,000, the cost of finished goods from Company A rises from AED 5,300,000 to AED 5,400,000, and profit falls from AED 1,200,000 to AED 1,100,000.

Adjusting yourself: one direction is free, the other is not

The transfer pricing disclosure form runs on self-assessment, and the guide places the burden of proof on the taxable person. It recommends monitoring controlled transactions throughout the tax period so that real-time adjustments can be made before the return is submitted, which is the cheapest place to fix a pricing drift.

After the return is filed the position changes, and it is asymmetric.

The practical consequence is that the year-end true-up many groups run as a routine journal is only routine in one direction. A downward true-up after filing is a process with the FTA, not an entry, and it needs to be planned for rather than discovered.

The guide also notes that the taxable person has the option to seek clarification on a point of law from the FTA, which is a different instrument from an adjustment and worth distinguishing in a file.

Where a free zone entity is on either side of the adjusted transaction, the exposure is not confined to the computation. Compliance with the arm's length principle is a condition of Qualifying Free Zone Person status, so an adjustment reaches the rate rather than only the number.

Related guideFor a Free Zone Company, Transfer Pricing Is Not a Penalty Risk

What to check

  1. Identify which clause your counterparty falls under: 34(10) for a UAE Related Party, 34(11) where a foreign authority adjusted first.
  2. For domestic transactions, expect the corresponding adjustment as of right — the Authority shall make it.
  3. For foreign adjustments, plan an application to the FTA and expect it to review the foreign adjustment rather than accept it.
  4. Check whether the counterparty enjoys a different rate or relief, because a matched adjustment is not neutral where the two sides are taxed differently.
  5. Monitor controlled transactions during the period so corrections happen before filing, not after.
  6. Treat a post-filing downward true-up as an FTA process, not a journal entry.
  7. Record why your chosen method was appropriate under the Clause 5 factors, since the FTA's examination starts from your method.
  8. Where an adjustment is proposed, ask for the information relied on — Article 34(9) requires it to be information that can or will be made available to you.

The FTA Transfer Pricing Guide (CTGTP1) is guidance rather than legislation; the operative provisions are in Article 34 of the Corporate Tax Law. Confirm the position for your own facts before relying on it.

Key takeaways

  • Article 34(8) requires the FTA to adjust taxable income where the result falls outside the arm's length range.
  • Article 34(9) requires the FTA to rely on information that can or will be made available to the taxable person.
  • Article 34(6) bases the FTA's examination on the method the taxable person used, provided it is appropriate under the Clause 5 factors.
  • Article 34(10): for a UAE Related Party the FTA shall make a corresponding adjustment — it is mandatory, and it is triggered by the taxpayer's own adjustment as well as the FTA's.
  • Article 34(11): where a foreign competent authority adjusted, the taxable person can apply for a corresponding adjustment — an application, not an entitlement.
  • The guide confirms the FTA will review a foreign adjustment rather than automatically give effect to it.
  • In Example 25 a move from cost plus 6% to cost plus 8% adds AED 100,000 to one party and removes AED 100,000 from the other.
  • After filing, adjustments increasing taxable profits are permitted; adjustments decreasing taxable profits or increasing losses may only be effected through FTA procedures.
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Article 34(10) says the Authority shall make a corresponding adjustment to the taxable income of the Related Party that is party to the transaction. It is expressed as an obligation, and it is triggered where either the Authority or the taxable person makes the original adjustment.

Not automatically. Article 34(11) lets the taxable person apply to the FTA for a corresponding adjustment, and the guide says the FTA will review the foreign adjustment. That is a different position from the domestic case, and it is where cross-border double taxation actually arises.

In one direction. After submitting a return you may make adjustments that increase taxable profits or reduce allowable losses. Adjustments that decrease taxable profits or increase allowable losses may only be effected through the operation of FTA procedures.

Only where both sides are taxed the same way. Where the counterparty is a Qualifying Free Zone Person at 0%, or has losses, reliefs or a different rate, the increase and the decrease are not worth the same, and the group can be worse off even with the corresponding adjustment made.

The guide describes the request as being made under the applicable provisions of the relevant Double Taxation Agreement. Article 34(11) as drafted does not itself impose that condition. Where no treaty covers the counterparty jurisdiction, that distinction is worth taking advice on rather than assuming either way.

Article 34(9) provides that where the Authority makes an adjustment under Clause 8 it shall rely on information that can or will be made available to the taxable person. That is a reason to ask what the adjustment rests on.

Talk to an Expert

Have a question about your situation?

This guide is general in nature. For advice tailored to your circumstances, schedule a free, no-obligation consultation with our team.

Call NowWhatsApp